conduct unbecoming

As I’ve said before, I’m not a fan of the current system whereby the State funds underqualified faith-oriented workers as the only dedicated emotional support person provided to students in public schools. In fact, it seems an increasing number of parents of all sorts are pretty tiffy that tax dollars are being used to pay religious workers to evangelise their kids.

This proselytising is not officially sanctioned. The Department of Education, Science and Training’s National School Chaplaincy Guidelines (p. 25) states:

“While recognising that an individual chaplain will in good faith express views and articulate values consistent with his or her denomination or religious beliefs, a chaplain should not take advantage of his or her privileged position to proselytise for that denomination or religious belief.”

Scripture Union Queensland is the largest supplier of chaplains in this state. Their Support School Chaplains website, which appears designed to allay the fears of secular parents and, perhaps, state Education Departments, apparently agrees with Education Queensland guidelines:

In accordance with Education Queensland guidelines, SU QLD chaplains are trained not to take advantage of their position to proselytise for their denomination or religious belief.

However, Scripture Union Qld’s main website lists the aims of the organisation thus:

It’s no wonder secular parents are concerned. Indeed anyone who is familiar with the Great Commission would find assertions that evangelism is not what chaplains are about hard to swallow. For those who don’t know, according to the Christian Bible, this primary directive was among the last instructions given by Jesus to his followers before his ascension to heaven. It runs like this:

[Jesus] said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. (Mark 16:15-16)

Indeed, Scripture Union’s stated aims (above) are a fair explanation of how Christians generally understand this central command should be played out in real life.

Frankly, I’m disappointed Scripture Union and other groups are being so disingenuous about their motivation for involvement in school chaplaincy. Scripture Union Queensland CEO, Tim Mander was recently quoted in The Courier Mail as saying,

I call chaplains the Salvos of the schoolyard. They serve without judgement and show their faith by their love, not what they say.

For non-Australian readers, by ‘Salvos’, Mr Mander means members of the Salvation Army, a once-evangelistic but now social welfare-oriented body that is generally well-accepted and even broadly supported by ordinary Australians. Tim, apparently, wants us to believe that Scripture Union is a purely nominal religious organisation populated by harmless do-gooders with no actual agenda.

Funny, that’s not what he says when he’s preaching to the converted. In an article in Christian Today Australia, Mander was more frank about the role of school chaplains:

Chaplains are making sensational inroads in bringing young people, their families, and entire communities, into a closer relationship with God,” he said.

That’s more like it. And, indeed, if Tim really believes what the Book says about the judgement that awaits the unbelievers he purports to love, his stated desire to share his beliefs with others are appropriately consistent.

What I find really disappointing is the dishonesty with which Tim Mander’s Scripture Union and other Christian organisations are handling the recent scrutiny of parents and the public. Facing the first serious challenge to their State-funded presence in schools in a century, groups like Scripture Union are scratching around to find plausible justifications for their continuing to enjoy the privilege of almost exclusive access to our children. They’ve realised that ‘ours is the real God’ and ‘we were here first’ no longer cut the mustard. But instead of fessing up and coming clean about their agenda – and thus allowing the parents and educators of Australia to put SU services on the table with other options and make an informed choice – Scripture Union et al have gone for a smoke and mirrors strategy. If there’s a name for ‘insisting something is true when it isn’t’ that isn’t a synonym for ‘lies’, I’d like to know what it is.

Frankly, if I were Tim Mander, I’d be ashamed of myself. And I might be wondering how much further I could go before I’d have crossed the line and have committed a frank denial of Christ. Indeed, I’d like to hear Tim explain how his denial that the reason he is the head of Scripture Union is to lead others to Christ doesn’t put him in danger of sharing the same eternal hotel suite as the ‘militant atheists’ who are buggering around with his heretofore unassailably secure job.

It’s time for Christians to tell the truth about what they are really doing in our schools and let parents and educators decide if they want them there. Then, fully informed, if a majority of parents in a particular school community decide that’s what they want for their children, well and good. But this sneaky underhandedness is not becoming for folk who profess to bepositive role models for students‘. And I, for one, am thoroughly disgusted by it.


4 thoughts on “conduct unbecoming

  1. Andrew Skegg says:

    Great article.

    One point I may mention: You state the Salvo’s were “once-evangelistic but now social welfare-oriented body” however their Mission Statement currently reads:

    “The Salvation Army, an international movement, is an evangelical part of the universal Christian Church. Its message is based on the Bible. Its ministry is motivated by love for God. Its mission is to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and meet human needs in His name without discrimination.” –

    I also draw your attention to their Position Statements on abortion, AIDS, sexuality, an d euthanasia.

  2. Doug Steley says:

    I used to be a strong supporter of the Salvos but over the last few decades I have seen their leadership and direction change from helping the poor and needy without religious overtones or preaching to one of being a strong and vocal political lobby group more concerned with power control and wealth then care for the disadvantaged.

    While this is a sweeping generalization of a very large organization the closeness between Major Brian Watters and John Howard and their mutually supportive stance of things like “A WAR ON DRUGS” and Zero Tolerance rather than harm minimization was dangerous in the extreme.

    Last Christmas we had Major Venables speaking against Tim Minchin donating his song for a Salvation Army charity CD just because Mr Minchin is an atheist. Apparently money given by atheists is not as good as that given by christians at helping the poor and needy.

    These may be isolated incidents but they still give an impression of intolerance and seeking power.

    It is disappointing to see.

  3. Senne Kuyl says:

    It is not just the secular people who should be upset with their wording. 2008 – 2009 I gave considerable (for me) money and time trying to support them in their mission and now I hear they aren’t really doing that? I don’t know what to think now that I’m an unbeliever. Either way I have been scammed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: